Vendor Evaluation Matrix Prompt Template
Build a vendor evaluation matrix with weighted criteria, scoring guide, and recommendation framework.
The Prompt
Make it specific to you
PromptITIN asks a few questions and builds a version tailored to your use case.
How to use this template
Copy the template
Click the copy button to grab the full prompt text.
Fill in the placeholders
Replace anything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details.
Paste into any AI tool
Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, and more.
Or enhance with AI
Sign in to PromptITIN and let AI tailor the prompt to your exact situation in seconds.
Why this prompt works
The disqualifier list is the most practically valuable element that most vendor matrices omit — it prevents a vendor that fails on a critical requirement from scoring its way back into contention through strength in irrelevant areas. Requiring specific per-level score descriptions (not just numbers) forces evaluators to agree on what 'good' looks like before they score.
Tips for best results
- Run the weighting exercise with all stakeholders independently before combining — if the Head of Engineering and the CFO weight price and reliability differently, you have a strategic disagreement to resolve before evaluating vendors
- Ask vendors for 3 customer references who are 18+ months into their contract — not the case studies on their website. Post-implementation satisfaction tells you what the sales process can't
- Score vendors blind where possible: run a rubric assessment before you know the pricing, then see if your preference changes when cost is revealed — this reveals hidden biases
- Always include total cost of ownership (implementation, training, integration, migration) in the price criterion — license cost alone is rarely representative of true cost
- Request a 30-day pilot or proof-of-concept with your actual data and workflows before final selection — demos always show the best path, pilots show the real path