Home/Templates/Vendor Evaluation Matrix
Business

Vendor Evaluation Matrix Prompt Template

Build a vendor evaluation matrix with weighted criteria, scoring guide, and recommendation framework.

The Prompt

ROLE: Procurement and vendor management specialist who has run RFP processes for software, services, and infrastructure decisions — you know that vendor selection done badly costs 3x the initial contract value in switching costs. CONTEXT: Vendor selection is a high-stakes, low-frequency decision that most teams approach inconsistently. The most common failure modes: picking a vendor based on the best demo (rather than the best fit), weighting price too heavily upfront, and not including the people who will actually use the product in the scoring process. This matrix must make the decision process defensible and transferable. TASK: Build a complete vendor evaluation matrix for selecting a [VENDOR_TYPE] for [USE_CASE]. Include criteria, weights, a scoring guide, and a recommendation framework. RULES: • Criteria must reflect what matters for this specific use case — not generic procurement criteria • Weights must reflect genuine priority: if reliability is more important than price, the matrix must reflect that • Each score level (1–5) must have a specific description — "4 = mostly meets requirements" is not useful • Include a "must-have" disqualifier list: criteria that automatically eliminate a vendor regardless of total score • The recommendation must specify the conditions under which a lower-scoring vendor should still be selected (e.g. strategic partnership value, unique capability) CONSTRAINTS: 8–10 criteria. Weights sum to 100%. Present as a table. Include a worked example for 2 hypothetical vendors. EDITABLE VARIABLES: • [VENDOR_TYPE] — what category of vendor (e.g. CRM software, logistics partner, marketing agency) • [USE_CASE] — specific context and requirements for this selection • [KEY_REQUIREMENTS] — non-negotiable capabilities or conditions • [EVALUATORS] — who will score (1 person vs committee — shapes the weighting process) • [BUDGET_RANGE] — context for how much weight price should carry OUTPUT FORMAT: Must-Have Disqualifiers (list) Evaluation Criteria & Weights (table) Scoring Guide (1–5 descriptions per criterion) Worked Example (2 vendors scored) Recommendation Template Key Questions to Ask Vendors QUALITY BAR: Someone new to the organisation should be able to use this matrix independently and arrive at a defensible recommendation — and the reasoning should hold up to scrutiny from finance, legal, and the end users.

Make it specific to you

PromptITIN asks a few questions and builds a version tailored to your use case.

✦ Enhance with AI

How to use this template

1

Copy the template

Click the copy button to grab the full prompt text.

2

Fill in the placeholders

Replace anything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details.

3

Paste into any AI tool

Works with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Cursor, and more.

4

Or enhance with AI

Sign in to PromptITIN and let AI tailor the prompt to your exact situation in seconds.

Why this prompt works

The disqualifier list is the most practically valuable element that most vendor matrices omit — it prevents a vendor that fails on a critical requirement from scoring its way back into contention through strength in irrelevant areas. Requiring specific per-level score descriptions (not just numbers) forces evaluators to agree on what 'good' looks like before they score.

Tips for best results

  • Run the weighting exercise with all stakeholders independently before combining — if the Head of Engineering and the CFO weight price and reliability differently, you have a strategic disagreement to resolve before evaluating vendors
  • Ask vendors for 3 customer references who are 18+ months into their contract — not the case studies on their website. Post-implementation satisfaction tells you what the sales process can't
  • Score vendors blind where possible: run a rubric assessment before you know the pricing, then see if your preference changes when cost is revealed — this reveals hidden biases
  • Always include total cost of ownership (implementation, training, integration, migration) in the price criterion — license cost alone is rarely representative of true cost
  • Request a 30-day pilot or proof-of-concept with your actual data and workflows before final selection — demos always show the best path, pilots show the real path

More Business templates

Business Proposal

Write a complete business proposal with executive summary, problem statement, solution, deliverables, timeline, and pricing — ready to send to clients.

View →

SWOT Analysis

Create a detailed SWOT analysis with 5 specific points per quadrant and 3 strategic recommendations grounded in the findings.

View →

Meeting Agenda

Build a focused meeting agenda with objectives, pre-reads, 5–7 time-allocated items, key decision points, and an action item template.

View →
← Browse all 195 templates