Education

AI for Researchers

Synthesize literature faster, write clearer findings, and collaborate better with AI

Researchers use AI to accelerate literature reviews, synthesize findings across multiple papers, identify gaps in existing research, write and structure academic papers, and translate technical findings into accessible language for grant applications, public communications, and policy briefs. AI compresses the most time-intensive reading and writing phases of the research process without replacing the scientific judgment that defines good research.

Common challenges AI helps solve

→

Conducting systematic literature reviews across hundreds of papers without missing critical studies

→

Writing grant applications that communicate research significance compellingly to non-specialist reviewers

→

Translating complex technical findings into language that policymakers and funders will understand and act on

Top use cases for Researchers

Synthesize research papers

I am reviewing 8 papers on the long-term cognitive effects of sleep deprivation. Here are the abstracts: [paste abstracts]. Synthesize these into a structured literature review section that: groups studies by methodology, identifies areas of consensus across studies, highlights conflicting findings and possible explanations for the conflict, notes methodological limitations common across the field, and identifies the most significant gap in the current literature. Academic tone, approximately 500 words.

Write a grant application section

Write the Significance section of an NIH R01 grant application for a study on early-life gut microbiome development and its relationship to childhood asthma incidence. The study will follow 800 children from birth to age 5 across 4 clinical sites. This section must: establish the public health burden of childhood asthma with specific statistics, explain why current treatments are insufficient and what gap this research addresses, articulate why this study design is the right approach, and close with a compelling statement of expected impact. 600 words, NIH review criteria language.

Write a policy brief

Write a 2-page policy brief based on the findings of a study showing that a 15-minute daily walking program in primary schools improved reading comprehension scores by 12% over 6 months. Audience: local government education officers who are non-scientists. Include: the problem statement in one paragraph, key finding summary in plain English, what the evidence means for school policy, 3 specific policy recommendations with implementation considerations, and a section on limitations so the brief is credible not oversimplified.

Identify research gaps

Based on these 12 paper summaries on remote work productivity research published between 2020 and 2024: [paste summaries]. Identify: 1) the 3 most consistent findings across studies, 2) 3 findings that are directly contradicted by other studies with a possible explanation for the contradiction, 3) demographic or contextual factors that are conspicuously understudied, 4) the most important research question that remains unanswered that a future study should address.

Write a research abstract

Write a structured abstract for a qualitative research paper on the lived experience of long-haul COVID patients navigating the UK healthcare system. Study: 24 semi-structured interviews analyzed using thematic analysis. Key themes identified: diagnostic uncertainty, dismissal by primary care physicians, the role of online peer communities, and mental health impact. Abstract format: Background, Objective, Methods, Results, Conclusions. Under 250 words. Journal of Medical Internet Research style.